Can you import our FlexiCapture document definitions?

Not today. Field sets, zones and validations are rebuilt here — the same work the Vantage path asks of you. What shortens it is blueprint provisioning and model-assisted template authoring: drop in a sample page, get a draft template with zones and data types, correct it, train it.

Is Tesseract going to lose against the ABBYY engine?

On degraded scans and dense forms, yes, measurably. That is why the hybrid path exists: Tesseract first, low-confidence words or pages re-read by a vision model. Settle it with a bake-off on your own documents — we publish the fields we lose.

We run ICR-heavy forms. Should we switch?

Probably not on that use case alone. Handwriting runs through the model path here, which carries a cost per page and a latency the traditional engines do not. We price it honestly rather than pretending the gap is closed.

Vantage has pre-trained skills. What do we get on day one?

A blueprint — finance, accounts payable, insurance, KYC, anti-money-laundering or supply chain — that provisions the project, workflow, routing, upload endpoint, export goal and a full field set in one action. That is a pre-authored field set, not a pre-trained model: you still author the template, with a model drafting it from a sample page. We would rather state that plainly than lose the pilot.

Can we run entirely offline?

Yes. Tesseract for text and a local GGUF vision model through a managed llama-server cover recognition with no outbound network. Vantage cannot run offline.

How does the cost curve actually compare?

Below roughly 100–150k pages a year, a metered platform is often cheaper than running infrastructure — we say so. Above it the gap widens every year, and for a service provider with twenty clients on one install it is not close.

Can you match its pages per hour?

Not as a blanket claim. Throughput here scales by adding nodes that declare the workflow duty, and the honest answer for any given box is a benchmark on your hardware and your paper. We run it before quoting volume.

Is your PDF/A really PDF/A?

The renditions assert PDF/A-2b with an sRGB output intent and PDF/A identification in XMP, built with PDFBox from stored page images and persisted word geometry. Archive buyers audit that claim, and we encourage validating a sample set with veraPDF as part of acceptance.

Do we have to draw a template for every supplier?

No. A template carries alternatives for layouts that differ, label search finds fields that move, and the model paths read documents you have not templated at all. Where a template does earn its keep is auditability: the same input produces the same output, and the field says which method produced it.

Can you learn from corrections the way Rossum does?

Templates train from operator corrections, and the verification hub's word-group mode applies one correction everywhere the same misread text appears. It is a different mechanism from a continuously retrained global model, and it stays inside your tenant.

We are happy with ChronoScan. When should we move?

When a second operator, a second client, an audit requirement or a compliance question arrives. Those are the four triggers we see — not features.

Is this overkill for one mailroom?

Possibly, and we will say so on the call. A single-machine install runs fine here, but if you will never need users, tenants, workflow or audit, the cheaper tool is the right tool.

Why would we leave a platform that works?

Usually one of three reasons: the renewal, a tenancy requirement Transact cannot meet, or a mandate to run models locally. If none of those apply, staying is a defensible answer and we will say so.

Our developers say they can wire this up in a sprint.

The recognition call, yes. The forty-odd capabilities around it — batch assembly, separator handling, template versioning, validation rules, an operator review UI, retries, retention, audit, tenant isolation, export mapping — are the sprint that never ends. Ask what happens when the person who wrote it leaves.

Can we use Textract as an engine here?

Recognition is pluggable and the plugin SDK exists for exactly this. Most teams end up local for volume and remote for the hard pages.

So you will not quote against ReadSoft for AP?

Not on SAP-native accounts payable with live master-data matching. We will quote for the other 70% of the documents in the building, and we will say the same thing on the first call as on the last.

Alternatives · Incumbent · platform

The Kofax alternative for buyers who need capture, not a suite.

Tungsten's footprint is the widest in this market: capture, orchestration, RPA, analytics, an e-invoicing network, and — since 2026.1 — LLM classification, email intake and MCP. If you need all of that, buy it. If you need capture, you are paying an order of magnitude more for the parts you will never switch on.

See the hubs Compare the run rate Quote a bake-off

The honest read

They win

The scanner ecosystem, with VRS as the image-processing benchmark
Orchestration far beyond capture: RPA, analytics, process modelling
An e-invoicing network sold as a service
An analyst-recognised position that clears procurement on its own

We win

Price by an order of magnitude — flat licence, no page meter, no module unlocks
Deployment simplicity: one artifact, PostgreSQL, done in an afternoon
MCP parity — an agent surface with OAuth 2.1, scopes, risk tiers and its own audit channel
Multi-tenancy without a second deployment
Browser-only hubs, embeddable in your own product

Where we lead

The renewal conversation. When a capture-only need is quoted against an automation-suite price list, the gap is not a discount away.

KognitCapture vs Kofax / Tungsten Automation, side by side

Capability	KognitCapture	Kofax / Tungsten Automation
Scope	Capture platform, deliberately	Capture inside a process automation suite
Typical contract	Flat licence for the deployment	$50k – $500k a year, plus services
Services to first value	Blueprint provisions a working project in one action	Commonly $20k – $150k+
Agent surface	109 curated MCP tools, scoped and audited	MCP shipped in TotalAgility 2026.1
Image processing	16-step chain, ordered per project	VRS — the market benchmark
Tenancy	Native tenant → organisation → project	Per-deployment

What each one costs to run

	KognitCapture	Kofax / Tungsten Automation
Licence shape	Flat platform licence, unlimited pages	Users + modules + volume
Typical annual outlay	Infrastructure + your team	$50k – $500k a year
Marginal cost per page	$0 local · tokens only if you choose remote	Metered
Who runs it	You do, on your own hardware	Heavy; services $20k–150k+

Figures for Kofax / Tungsten Automation are published list bands and analyst-reported contract benchmarks checked in August 2026 — not quotes, and not vendor-confirmed. Your negotiated price will differ.

Switching

Tungsten now owns Ephesoft as well. Consolidation under one owner tends to arrive with one price list, which is exactly when a flat, self-hosted platform gets a hearing.

Read the migration brief →

Questions buyers ask us about Kofax / Tungsten

We already run TotalAgility for process automation. Why change capture?

You may not need to. The strongest shape is often capture here, feeding your existing orchestration through REST, JDBC, message bus or file drop — you keep the process estate and stop paying capture volume fees.

Does anything replace VRS?

The pre-processing chain covers deskew, despeckle, binarize, crop, line and punch-hole removal and colour dropout, ordered per project. VRS remains the benchmark on hostile paper; on ordinary departmental scanning the difference rarely survives a bake-off.

Next step

Send 200 pages. Get a field-level accuracy report.

Including the fields we lose on. That is the only comparison worth having against a two-decade incumbent.

A bake-off is a paid engagement at our standard consulting rate, scoped and quoted before it starts and running one to two days, two at most — not a free trial. The report is yours whichever way it lands.

Ask for a bake-off quote

Compare against something else

ABBYY FlexiCapture ABBYY Vantage FineReader Server Rossum ChronoScan Ephesoft Transact Amazon Textract ReadSoft